Labels

Entertainment (18) Food (7) News (19) Sports (8) Videos (2)

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Diane Disney Miller interview

The real Disney princess: Walt Disney's daughter on the man behind the brand.

Diane Disney-Miller
Diane Disney Miller, daughter of Walt Disney and guardian of his legacy Photo: Getty

It is morning in San Francisco and a multinational group of journalists is sitting around a table facing an elegant woman in her mid-seventies.
An original advertisement for 'Fantasia'
An original advertisement for 'Fantasia' from the Disney Museum in San Francisco
Dressed all in grey – silk shirt, checked skirt and jacket – with her neatly coiffed head tilted slightly to one side, she is listening closely to a flustered Spanish journalist.
‘What,’ says the journalist in halting English, her face growing redder by the moment, ‘is your most favourite Disney movie?’
The question would be inane were it not addressed to the woman at the head of the table: Diane Disney Miller, the only biological child of Walter Elias Disney, and as such the only direct blood link to one of the towering figures of 20th-century culture. The first little girl in the world (or joint first, along with her adopted sister, Sharon) to watch Mickey Mouse caught up in a swirling deluge in Fantasia, or to see Dumbo flap his ears and take flight, or to weep over the death of Bambi’s mother.
When she was six or seven, her father brought her home a sketch of a girl done by the Mexican painter Diego Rivera: ‘To Diane’, it said, ‘daughter of the great artist’.
Diane rarely speaks to the press; for the past 40 years she’s lived in relative obscurity in California’s Napa Valley. She’s agreed to be interviewed to celebrate the 70th anniversary of Fantasia, her father’s masterpiece and her favourite – today, at least – of the Disney canon. And people have flown from all over the world to meet her.
Her childhood, she says, was blissful. Every evening at seven o’clock the family dined together. Talk often turned to Walt’s childhood in Marceline, Missouri, and in Kansas City: ‘Dad said of his childhood, of his own life: “I’ve always worked hard, but I’ve never been unhappy.”’ For his children, Walt envisioned a comfortable life and one without toil.
When Diane was about 16, she asked her father whether she could get a summer job. Many of her school friends were working, mostly in their fathers’ offices. ‘He said: “You don’t need a job”,’ she remembers. ‘“If you get one you’ll be taking one away from someone who does.” I think that’s very telling. “I can look after you,” that was his message.’
Diane still had dreams. She imagined that one day she might be a journalist, travelling the world as a foreign correspondent. Her father tried to help her: he suggested that she write a script for him, about a modern-day descendant of Robinson Crusoe who ends up shipwrecked.
‘I didn’t even like the idea,’ she says, ‘and as he couldn’t get me excited about it, he did it himself.’ (It became the 1966 Dick van Dyke film Lt Robin Crusoe, USN.)
At the age of 20 she married Ron Miller, a college football star. They bought a house funded by the sales of a book, The Story of Walt Disney, which Diane was supposed to have written.
In fact, the book was written by a man called Pete Martin, making Diane a rare sort of biographer – one with a ghost. She was there for the interview sessions, sitting in the garden with Martin and her father as they recorded hours of tapes about Walt’s life.
‘It was rather a pleasant experience, listening to Dad talk about his life. If you listen to the tapes you can hear my little voice now and then, my high, girlish voice.’ The whole thing was a scheme to get some ready cash to Diane and her new husband, as Walt’s money was tied up in developing Disneyland.
Walt didn’t groom Diane or her sister to play any serious part in his business. ‘He never pushed us into anything,’ she says, ‘and I kind of wish he had now that I think back on it. I think he didn’t want us to suffer.’ But Diane’s life was to remain entangled with the company that bore her father’s name. ‘To me, it’s still,’ she pauses for emphasis, ‘my name.’
We meet in San Francisco at a place that sums up the contradictory nature of her role: the Walt Disney Family Museum. The museum is housed in a clean red-brick building fronted with slim white wooden pillars, nestled in the verdant northeastern tip of the San Francisco peninsula.
It was financed by the Walt Disney Family Foundation, of which Diane is the secretary and her son Walter the president. She cut the ribbon to open it just over a year ago. ‘He’s kind of alive in this place,’ she says. ‘You see him and you hear him.’
Her father’s voice echoes through the galleries of the museum. There are passport photos of Walt and his wife, Lillian, goofing around, the bench he would sit on in Los Angeles’s Griffith Park when his daughters rode the carousel.
You touch a circle and a wizened Disney animator pops up on a screen, explaining how they devised a certain scene; a hologram of Dick van Dyke gives a rather erudite enumeration of the process of optical printing.
The Walt Disney Company had nothing to do with establishing the museum; indeed, Diane says: ‘The company probably wouldn’t have done it.’
The company, after all, had no particular need to. Under the stewardship of Michael Eisner, CEO from 1984 to 2005, its revenues had grown 2,000 per cent. The greedy Mouse gobbled up other businesses, diversifying until the animation department became only one among many.
Creative work was outsourced to companies like Pixar – a relationship that soured when the bullish Eisner refused to renegotiate a more favourable contract with Pixar’s then-CEO, Steve Jobs. The Walt Disney Company was no longer synonymous with family – unless the family in question was the Borgias.
Diane saw the bloodletting at close hand: her cousin, Roy E Disney, oversaw the coup that ousted her husband, Ron, in favour of Eisner.
When ‘Uncle Walt’ was alive, there was a simple hierarchy in the business: everyone answered to Walt, the prime mover and patriarch.
Diane sighs when I ask what her father would have made of the way the company developed after his death in 1966: ‘I can’t even begin to answer that question,’ she says wearily. ‘It’s a whole different company. It’s huge. It’s so big.’ She remembers her children telling her that their friends didn’t know that Walt Disney was a man: they only knew his name as a brand.
For his daughter, of course, the opposite is true. She never sat on the board of the company and in the late Eighties she sold the last of her personal stock. Her father’s name and likeness are owned by the Walt Disney Company.
It also owned almost all the material Diane needed for the displays in her museum, aside from Disney’s Academy Awards, a few documents and the artwork that the family acquired once they’d started the project. The only power left to her was symbolic: her name.
It’s a measure of her influence that her comments always made it into the press. She spoke out against various Disney biographers, including Neal Gabler, whose book – ‘a monstrous piece of libellous junk’ – had been officially sanctioned by the company. Gabler had suggested that her father had neglected her mother in favour of his model train set.
She debunked rumours: that her father was an FBI agent, that he’d had his body cryogenically frozen, that he was the illegitimate son of a Spanish mother.
In 2007, she was the first, even before new Disney CEO Bob Iger, to denounce a Hamas children’s television show that featured a Mickey Mouse lookalike singing about children arming themselves with AK-47s.
In 1995, she wrote an open letter to Richard Nixon’s daughters apologising for the Walt Disney Company’s production of the Oliver Stone biopic, Nixon.
‘I am ashamed,’ she wrote, ‘that the Walt Disney Company – the company my father created – is associated with this disturbing distortion of history.’ It’s telling that she empathised so completely with the children of one of history’s most publicly maligned men.
The museum is the final, fullest realisation of her defence of her father.
Does she ever wish she’d taken on more of a role in the company, so she could’ve kept his vision alive that way? ‘No, no, my role’s just what I wanted it to be,’ she says. ‘I don’t know what I could’ve contributed that would’ve been important to the company. My purpose is to bring the man to people, not the brand. He was a good man and I wanted people to know that.’




Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/starsandstories/8126800/Diane-Disney-Miller-interview.html

No comments:

Post a Comment